EVALUATING..
MINUSCULE
MANUSCRIPTS
There
is yet a surprising number of Greek New Testament manuscripts which
have
not been fully analyzed as to their provenance
or date. Many of them
have
had their text-types ascertained (though often quite sporadically). Here on
this page
we
shall present materials which can assist with dating the script of a
minuscule
manuscript via comparison with
known
dated samples. We shall also strive to locate the provenance (an effort in
progress),
and
identify the scribe in some cases.
Demonstrated
manuscripts include, New Testament texts, lectionaries, Biblical
commentary,
writings of church fathers and other commonly produced manuscripts of
Byzantine
scriptoriums (not typikons or menologia).
(NOTE:
some of these files are quite big, and a browser will not view them,
in
such cases, download the image for off-line viewing)
|
|
|
|
MS 461 (and uncial 018)
--- DATE 835
|
461 . . . . .018
. . . read PDF |
|
MS 1582 --- DATE 948/949
scribe --- Ephraim
color of headpieces
suggest a product of a Constantinopolitan scriptorium, as well as the
style of script.
|
NOT by the same Ephraim
of MS 1739 |
| Psalms
with Catena
----- DATE 950 |
MS Auct.
D.4.1. |
| MS
424 ---- DATE 944 - 956 [Date is based upon the names of the patriarchs
and emperors mentioned in its accessory materials]. Manuscript was made
in Constantinople. |
|
|
Chrysostom --- DATE 955
scribe --- Nicephorus
the Notary
provenance --- uncertain,
similar to Jerusalem (Sabas) MSS.
|
Princeton, Univ. Library. cod. Garrett
14 |
|
Chrysostom --- DATE 976 |
Bodleian
Library, Laud. MS
Gk. 75
|
| »562
------ DATE 991 |
|
| Homilies
of John Chrysostom ---- DATE 995 |
Dionysiou codex 70, |
|
MS 910 ---- DATE 1009 |
 |
|
MS 1734 --- DATE 1015 |
 |
|
MS 348 --- DATE 1023 |
 |
|
MS 623 ---- DATE 1037 |
 |
|
MS 1933 --- DATE 1045 |
|
| »1692
---- DATE 1059 |
Dionysiou 587; Note P.
Canart's "epsilon arrondi" |
|
MS 1209 --- DATE 1067 |
 |
| Theodoret
on the Prophets ---- DATE 1067 |
MS Auct. T.2.2
|
|
MS 1871 --- DATE 1083
color image via the efforts
of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts; Dallas, Texas.
|
|
|
MS 1521 --- DATE 1084 |
|
| Theodore
Studites ---- DATE 1086 |
Sinai Cod. 401
|
|
MS 104 ---- DATE 1087 |
|
| MS
2622 ----
DATE 1109 |
 |
|
Commentary on Matthew --- DATE 1109
|
Corpus Christi College, MS 25.
Note P. Canart's "epsilon
arrondi".
|
|
MS 203 --- DATE 1111 |
 |
| »868
---- DATE 1118/1119 |
Sinai Cod. 234
|
| Psalter
---- DATE 1121/1122 |
Sinai Cod. 44 |
|
MS 1195 ---- DATE 1123 |
 |
|
MS 1230 --- DATE 1124 |
 |
| MS
1194 ---- DATE 1127/1157 |
Sinai, Gr. 157 |
|
MS 157 --- DATE 1128/1129 |
best image I can get at this time
:-( |
|
MS 927 --- DATE 1133
scribe --- Theoktistes
provenance --- probably
a scriptorium in Constantinople
|
One of 5 illuminations,
this of Luke - folio 69v. MS is now, MS Ludwig II 4; 83.MB.68 of the J.
Paul Getty Museum. |
| MS
1152 --- DATE 1133 |
 |
| Gregory
of Nazianzus ---- DATE 1136/1155 |
Sinai Cod. 339
|
| Simeon
Stylites (Jr.) ---- DATE 1141 |
MS. Rawlinson G.
199 |
| »1033
----- DATE 1152 |
 |
| MS
162 ---- DATE 1153 |
same scribe as MS 1361.
Note P. Canart's "epsilon arrondi". |
|
MS 1361 --- DATE 1156 |
same scribe as MS 162.
Note P. Canart's "epsilon arrondi". |
| MS
747 --- DATE 1164 |
 |
| »854
----- DATE 1167 |
 |
| »855
---- DATE 1175 |
Sinai, Cod. 221
|
| »330
----- DATE 1185 |
 |
|
MS 1217 --- DATE 1187 |
 |
|
MS 1238 --- DATE 1244 |
 |
|
MS 1201 --- DATE 1250 |
 |
|
MS 390 ---- DATE 1282 |
 |
|
MS 1213 --- DATE 1286 |
 |
|
MS 165 ---- DATE 1292 |
 |
|
MS 2085 --- DATE 1308 |
 |
| Psalter
---- DATE 1313 |
Dionysiou 65
|
|
MS 2278 --- DATE 1314/1315 |
 |
|
MS 1922 --- DATE 1318 |
 |
|
MS 1506 --- DATE 1320 |
|
|
MS 2060 --- DATE 1330/1331 |
 |
|
MS 1336 --- DATE 1332 |
a bit degraded! |
|
MS 1960 --- DATE 1366 |
 |
|
MS 1147 --- DATE 1370
scribe --- Joasaph
color image via the efforts of the Center
for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts; Dallas, Texas. www.CSNTM.org
|
Note
MS 1960 and MS 1147 by same
scribe, Ioasaph (or Joasaph or Joseph) |
| Qui Dei dicit
est maxime gravis; omnes ceterae formae congruens libri divini manu scriptus
sunt secundara. |
What God says
is most important; all other features of a Biblical manuscript are secondary. |

... click here
to return to the main TEXTUAL CRITICISM page
click
to jump to the home / index page
|
| |
| |